Although as I write this Ghana has just eliminated the USA and thus enters the last 8, but remember they only qualified for the last 16 by being awarded a penalty for a “handball” that never was – against Australia.
So the dreams of FIFA and the multi-cultis who are so desperate to see a nigger nation steal the Soccer World Cup, are thus kept alive for another game. But, can you imagine the uproar and the rioting that would occur if the blackies made the Final, or even the semis, and were then eliminated by having an “unfair” penalty awarded against them?
Is there a referee alive who is brave enough to award a crucial penalty against a black side on the verge of winning the WC? I seriously doubt it.
Anyway, if Ghana makes it through to the semis, I am predicting that the Africoon quota will be increased from 5 to 6 or even 7 teams at the next WC. Because by foul means or foul a black side MUST be made to win and thus eliminate another hurdle of the white racism and inequality that has always held them back!
Anyway, the best thing about this WC was the humiliating early exit of a “French” team whose majority black players apparently refused to sing the Marseillaise and then went on training strike over an alleged “racist” slight from their white trainer. The way things are going Englands similarly multi-cult side will also exit soon – and good riddance!
I fancy Uruguay as an outside bet – dammit I really meant to have a $100 punt on them at the outset when I probably could have got 100 to 1, but my computer connection was so poor and the Betfair site is so full of stuff that I couldn´t get the frigging bet on. Too late now, others have woken up to their chances.
Anyway, this is a very good article about the racial make-up of the competing teams – be sure to click on the link and read the always excellent comments of the Amren readers.
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2010/06/black_men_cant.php
Joe Kowalski, Alternative Right, June 19, 2010
Soccer—fútbol, Fußball, futebol, football—is the world’s most popular sport, and literally hundreds of millions of people are now watching the 2010 World Cup. {snip}
{snip}
Race is also on display on the pitch and for all the talk of diversity, multiculturalism, and a global community, most of the 32 teams in the field feature racially exclusive teams.
European and South American teams dominate world soccer and have won every single World Cup. But to make the event a truly global affair, there are quotas for each region so that everyone feels represented.
I watched each opening round game and noted the races of all 11 starters for each squad. All five sub-Saharan Africa squads (Nigeria, South Africa, Ivory Coast, Ghana and Cameroon) start all blacks. All three Asian teams (Japan, South Korea and North Korea) start all Asians. The one North African team (Algeria) starts all Arabs. The eastern European teams (Slovenia, Slovakia, and Serbia) start all whites.
Australia and New Zealand are not soccer powers but each qualified this year. Australia starts an all white team and New Zealand starts 10 whites and one aboriginal (probably a Maori).
Latin American teams are a mixed bag racially, much like the region itself. The races of some of the players are often hard to pinpoint. Are they mestizos or darker skinned whites of Portuguese or Spanish descent?
The three white nations of Latin America start mostly white sides. Argentina starts nine or 10 whites with one or maybe two mestizos. Uruguay starts nine whites with one clear mestizo and one clear Negro. Chile starts seven or eight whites with three or four mestizos.
Mexico and Paraguay have a starting 11 consisting of a mixture of whites and mestizos. Honduras starts eight mestizos and, surprising, three blacks.
Brazil starts four whites and seven players who are black or racially mixed.
The United States again made the tournament and has a decent shot of advancing to the next round of 16. Racially, the team starts seven whites and four blacks. Mestizos are now about 15 percent of the U.S. population, but there are only three Hispanics on the team and one of them—Carlos Bocanegra—is clearly a white Hispanic. The two mestizos are backups and there are no Asians or Middle Easterners on the U.S. squad. The U.S. is being overwhelmed with millions of soccer-mad immigrants every year. Why aren’t these people making the national team?
So far, most nations of the world have teams that racially represent their people. Black Africans, Asians, Arabs, and Eastern Europeans (God bless ’em) can support teams that reflect them 100 percent. Whites in Australia and New Zealand can still proudly support a team that looks like them.
Blacks are overrepresented on the Brazilian side, but most Latin American nations have squads that reflect their racial demographics. Americans are no doubt used to blacks being overrepresented on national sports teams, but the current squad has enough whites so that it is not viewed as alien—like the often all-black U.S. national basketball team.
We are constantly told that multiculturalism and diversity are unalloyed blessings. But of course, white nations are the only countries that are enjoying these blessings—and it is starting to show in the national squads of the Western European teams.
Italy has won four World Cups including the last one in 2006. They cling stubbornly to the view that Italians don’t need blacks to win World Cups and still start an all-white (and, with one exception, all-Italian) side. {snip}
Germany has won three World Cups and is always a threat to win it all. This year’s starting squad can be described—depending on your definition of white—as either all-white or as nine whites and two Turks. Like Italy, the Germans have stubbornly resisted starting supposedly superior black players.
France has shown no such resistance. Historically not a soccer power, they won their only World Cup in 1998 with four black starters and apparently attributed the victory to having more blacks. They have consistently fielded seven blacks starters since and this year is no exception as the four true Frenchmen who start for France stand out on the pitch. The French side represents Africa and not the traditional French nation. Happily, the side is beset with squabbling and will probably go home early this year.
Nigger penalty kick
England won their only World Cup in 1966 with an all-white side but is perhaps going the way of France. They started a bare majority of whites over blacks in their first round game. They may start 7 whites for the next game but the team is trending black. Perhaps if England is bounced from the tournament in the first round it will change things. The team disappointed in a first round draw versus the U.S.
Spain is the favorite to win the whole thing. Like the Italians, the Spanish are all white and have found great success lately. {snip}
Portugal also has an outside chance to win the whole tournament. Led by the great Cristiano Ronaldo, the squad starts 10 whites and one black.
The Greeks round out a solid Southern European contingent with an all-white side.
A few years ago, the Netherlands seemed on the verge of becoming another France. This year’s squad starts nine whites but has several black substitutes who will see playing time. {snip}
Denmark has 10 whites and one black who distinguished himself by accidentally hitting the ball into his own net and losing the first game for the Danes.
Switzerland starts two blacks and an Arab. But the team still retains an overall European identity and pulled a huge upset over Spain in the first round of games.
{snip}
Since only white nations let in millions of people of different races, they are the only countries to be effected by demographic change. Asians, Africans (both Arab and black) and mestizos can be sure their national soccer teams will always represent them. If Eastern Europe can hold the line on immigration, they can also be confident that their teams will always reflect them as well.
{snip}
Another lesson is that it is mainly blacks who are changing the face of the Western European soccer teams. There are many more Arabs and Middle Easterners in France and the Netherlands than blacks. Why are these significant minorities absent from the starting lineups? In England, there are many more Pakistanis, Indians, and Bangladeshis than blacks. Yet they are not represented on the national team. As noted, mestizos and Asians have yet to make an impact on the U.S. side.
A proper HBD response might be that blacks are better athletes than whites, and much better athletes than Arabs, Asians, and mestizos. But that is certainly not reflected in the World Cup results. All-black African sides are losers who have never come close to contending for the World Cup, though soccer is universally played throughout the Dark Continent. Some might say they need better training and coaching, but all black African teams are currently coached by whites. Even the Asian sides usually outplay the all-black nations. Though they enjoy home field advantage, the record of the all-black teams at this writing is a pathetic one win, four losses, and two draws. {snip}
On a more political note, I noted the typically fawning news coverage the media have given South Africa. They have not been too curious about the robberies of players and fans and the killings (one victim was Nelson Mandela’s great granddaughter, which kept him from the opening ceremonies) that have occurred around the event.
Several commentators have referred to the “the rainbow nation” of South Africa without wondering why the national team is all black. This is especially ironic as the ANC has mandated quotas for the sport of rugby to ensure some black representation in this white-dominated sport.
