CRIMCAM

THE FAECES SPECIES

One look at the sneering arrogance and the cold vacant stare on these representative samples of simian sub-humanity surely proves that, with their belief in Phrenology, the Victorians were on the right path to an accurate facial id of the criminally-inclined. The politically-correct revisionists who attempt to dismiss Phrenology as a “nowadays discredited pseudo-science" are the ones who should be throughly discredited and thoroughly ashamed, because Phrenology could save many lives of many innocent crime victims.

I’ve always maintained that the preventive elimination of criminally intentioned individuals (preferably at birth, if not before) would be an infinitely more efficient method of crime control than our idiotic system of waiting for the sub-human scum to commit their evil deeds, then trying to catch them at public expense, then trying to convict them at even greater public expense, and then having to pay to have these creatures incarcerated, fed and cared-for at enormous public (human) expense for the remainder of their useless turd-extruding lives.

OK, the rest of this post is satire...but,

Someone should invent a crim-catching camera, one that incorporates facial-recognition software that rates faces for criminal propensity on an index of 1-10, with "1" being the face of a totally honest and sincere person like Madiba (sarcasm), and "10" being the complete opposite, like Mugarbage or the lumps of putrid excrement illustrated above.

Now if I were to write such a piece of software, I would vastly simplify the code by giving every nigger face a default "flag-fall" criminality index of no less than 5..!! Most race realists would rightly aver and say "what ONLY 5..! Bullshit, at least 9"..! This is my liberal side coming out..!

In my ideal future eco-cities powered by the renewable energy of nigger criminals on treadmills (I never said it was “clean” or "emission-free" energy, just renewable and in great abundance), any citizen scoring a perfect "1" on the "CRIMCAM" would be licenced to take random photos of suspicious looking characters (nigger and muslim mug-shots would obviously be prime targets – and muslims hate being photographed, hehhe) and, once the criminal is captured and caged and put to good use producing electricity, manure, and pig-swill, the crim-cam toting citizen would receive a reward. No criminals, no police force, no courts, no lawyers (they will be on the treadmill too), and no wages to pay – would this not be the perfect society?

1790 - Boers save Australia from starvation

Image: Sirius Rock and Plaque at Mosman Bay.

This historical episode has been virtually forgotten by modern Australians who, of all people, should remember when their nascent and fragile colony was saved from starvation by the racist Boers..!!

The frigate HMS Sirius was the Royal Naval flagship that escorted the “First Fleet”, departing Portsmouth in August 1787 bound for Botany Bay, NSW, where they arrived in Jan 1788. After depositing their human and animal cargoes, the 11 transport ships returned to England, leaving only the Sirius and the smaller Supply to defend the new penal colony.

After a few months it became clear that the harvest was not going to be sufficient to feed the colony, partly because the land around Sydney Cove was not very productive but also because the convicts did not make good farmers. By October the food supply had become so critical that Sirius, a warship not a transport, was sent on a perilous emergency mission to the nearest reliable wheat growing source. And where was that? It was half-way around the world at the Cape of Good Hope, at that time administered by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), and not yet a British colony.

Sirius circumnavigated the globe via Cape Horn, loading up at Kaapstad with Boer-grown wheat and other Boer produce, returning to Port Jackson 7months later in May 1789 with enough food to keep the colony alive until the next (better) harvest and/or the arrival of the 2nd fleet.

After this epic RTW voyage the Sirius was in a bad state, so she was beached on a remote cove of the largely unexplored north shore of Port Jackson where she was repaired and “careened” of marine growth, etc, before returning to service. Just months later, in March 1790, HMS Sirius was wrecked on the reefs of Norfolk Island. Her anchor was later recovered and is on permanent display in Macquarie Place, close to Circular Quay. The outdoor seating area of the adjacent "Customs House" pub is a good place to sit and appreciate it.

The sheltered bay where Sirius was beached was initially named “Great Sirius Cove”, but later renamed “Mosman Bay” after the owner of the whaling industry that later occupied the bay. (Nearby "Little Sirius Cove" abuts onto the famous Taronga Park Zoo). Today, this beautiful spot only a 20 minute ferry ride from Circular Quay, is surrounded by 1920's mansions and expensive apartments, and packed with yachts, notably the 42m “Nelson” (hopefully named after the naval hero and not the false black “saint”!). It is one of the most expensive Sydney suburbs, expect to pay $A700,000+ (R5 million) for a small 2br apart with good views.

Every Australian child is taught about the first fleet, in fact any Australian who can trace their line to a convict, especially a 1st Fleet arrival, is regarded almost as a national treasure. But very few remember this episode, and even fewer (in fact NONE) have ever thanked the Boers of South Africa for having saved their once fragile colony.

On the contrary todays smugly self-satisfied offspring of petty criminals and ten quid trash who "call Arse-stray-liar home", have done everything politically, economically, and culturally possible to destroy their race relatives in South Africa by cynically conspiring with Black Thugs and Islamo-Fascists and self-hating white neo-Marxists, in the international anti-white "morality" fest that "triumphantly" ended in the undeserved gift of Africa's only civilised nation to Mandela’s moronic (IQ67) and psycopathic Xhosa savages. Meanwhile, in their stupefying self-righteous ignorance, Arse-stray-liars have been led by the nose to believe Mandela's Xhosa savages are the local “Aborigines” whose land it once was..!!! Fact is that, before 1900, when a few hundred black wekkas were imported from the Transkei region to help build Cape Town's new Victoria dock, there were no Bantu settleMUNTS within 1000km of Cape Town.

So, in order that some selfish self-righteous Arse-stray-liars could heal their (IMO, unjustified) guilt-complex about their own worthless indigenous sub-humans, and feel that re-assuring inner glow of goodness that comes from doing supposedly charitable deeds; every year thousands of South African whites are brutally murdered (and frequently tortured) by prowling bands of predatory sub-human psychopaths let loose and virtually sponsored by the gang of criminal psycopaths that unjustly mis-rules a once-great country that they KNOW they could never have built and KNOW they will never be able to maintain. The Afro-Nazi Criminals (ANC).

White South Africans are paying a terrible price for the arrogant selfish hypocrisy displayed by (many) white Australians, especially their political leaders.

“The degree of sympathy whites feel for blacks is in inverse proportion to their actual experience with them”. How true..!

The mystery of Albert Schweitzer's heretical passage.

Remember this..?

"I have given my life to try to alleviate the sufferings of Africa. There is something that all white men who have lived here like I must learn and know: that these individuals are a sub-race. They have neither the intellectual, mental, or emotional abilities to equate or to share equally with white men in any function of our civilization. I have given my life to try to bring them the advantages which our civilization must offer, but I have become well aware that we must retain this status: the superior and they the inferior. For whenever a white man seeks to live among them as their equals they will either destroy him or devour him. And they will destroy all of his work. Let white men from anywhere in the world, who would come to Africa, remember that you must continually retain this status; you the master and they the inferior like children that you would help or teach. Never fraternize with them as equals. Never accept them as your social equals or they will devour you. They will destroy you."

I'll return to that, but meanwhile....

Many people today would be amazed and shocked to discover that, prior to WW2 (and, to a gradually lesser degree, until the early 1960’s) virtually all white men of learning and distinction would today be regarded as “racial supremacists of the worst sort”. This is largely why the acronym “DWEM” (Dead White European Male) had to be coined, in order to belittle their academic heritage whilst poking fun both at their imperfect morality and their mortality.

“Young people – don’t be in awe of past generations of white men – firstly they are dead, so they cannot have been as great as they have been portrayed, and secondly you can safely ignore much of what they said because most of them were odious racists”.

For example, here are a couple of quotes from 2 famous American “liberals”
(uh-oh, I can’t vouch for their accuracy either, but they do ring truthful for their times)

Inscribed on the Jefferson Memorial in Washington DC in reference to Negro slaves:

"Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate, than that these people are to be free.”

Thomas Jefferson's actual words:

"Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate, than that these people are to be free; nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them."

Abraham Lincoln to a group of Negro community leaders on August 14th of 1862:

"Why should the people of your race be colonized, and where? Why should they leave this country? This is, perhaps, the first question for proper consideration. You and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss, but this physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think your race suffer very greatly, many of them by living among us, while ours suffer from your presence. In a word, we suffer on each side. If this be admitted, it affords a reason at least why we should be separated. It is better for both, therefore, to be separated."

Therefore, it came as no great surprise to find that Albert Schweitzer held “racist” opinions about blacks, especially so since he lived amongst them for 50 years. That is to say he didn’t believe the prevailing orthodoxy - the Marxist misinformation that “all races are inherently equal”, and that if some APPEAR not to be equal it is only because they haven’t been educated”. In other words, its whiteys fault AS USUAL of course, as it is our responsibility to educate them isn’t it? (If, like me, you can immediately spot the flagrant flaw within this classic case of “liberal logic”, then you are obviously a racist too..!)

Now if one hundred liberals had loudly proclaimed that Schweitzer, a Nobel Prize Peace Prize winner, “never said such a thing” I would have rightfully ignored them due to the liberal urgency to grasp at the flimsiest straw that would seem to support racial equality whilst ignoring the strongest tree pointing in the opposite direction. Liberals are part liar, part fools, and part self-deceivers, but mostly they are intellectually dishonest LIARS..!

However, once a single “race-realist” (ie, an intellectually honest person) sincerely questions the veracity of the passage, then I really have to think again. Also the more I thought about this "quote" the more I began to get suspicious, esp as there was no chapter/page reference. It is very important that us RR's dont publish untruths - that is the trademark of the lying liberal.

A bit of internet searching didn’t throw any new light on the matter, so it necessitated a trip to my local library, which in my case is the South African Library in the Company Gardens. The first surprise - given it supposedly contained the heretical passage - was that they had the book at all. But they have both the original German version and the 1938 English translation (by Mrs C.E.B.Russell) .

As the title suggests, “African Notebook” is rather a short book, of about 132 pages, and doesn’t appear to have any controversial content aside from a short chapter (p.48-56) entitled “differences between white and black people". (Today, to even suggest there are ANY differences aside from skin colour would be considered controversial, as we all now know there are NO differences, don’t we?) But even this potentially scandalous chapter doesn’t say anything negative about Africans – on the contrary - rather like a “progressive” white apologist, Schweitzer is at pains to focus on a few common traits wherein (given a bit of liberal embellishMUNT) Africans could in some trivial ways considered to be BETTER than whites..!

With the benefit of hindsight it was suspicious that a specific chapter or page was never mentioned, only the name of the book. Also, in 1950, the Useless Nations (in a foretaste of the lunacy for which it was to become known) solemnly declared that all humans were equal.
All in all, it would have been surprising for him to have won a Nobel Prize AFTER saying such things, even back in 1951.

Of course, this does not mean that Schweitzer NEVER expressed these words, but if he did then I am now quite sure it was not in a mainstream publication – more likely it was in an interview (or letter) to an obscure European magazine and most probably not long before his death at the age of 90 in 1965. Old people are inclined to speak their mind – it is perhaps the only advantage bestowed by old age. Besides which, it is apparently acknowledged even amongst liberals that Schweitzer did have some racist traits – he would not sit at the same dining table as Africans, for example, and this dovetails rather closely with some of what he purportedly said in the heretical passage.

The bottom line is, it doesn’t really matter whether he said it or not, because anyone who knows the African mentality well, knows the sentiments expressed are 100% accurate.

The Disaster of Democrazy..!

DEMOCRAZY is a fatally flawed concept, even in civilised countries. Last night I watched in disgust as Billary blatantly bribed the MORONITY with freebies and subsidies and suchlike.

But as bad as it is in the West it is an unmitigated disaster for white people in African countries. And yet, if you were to ask them, 99% still claim to believe in it. Whites have truly become tragic victims of their own well-intentioned propaganda.

The only way out of this bind is for like-minded people to seek out under-populated land in friendly host countries that would be willing to offer very long leases in which to create new city-states and mini-states from scratch.

Many South/Central American countries have vast swathes of under-utilised territories and might be amenable. Such enclaves/colonies would offer many advantages for the host country too.

Qualified franchise seems like a good idea, but qualified by what parameters?

This is a subject I’ve put quite a lot of thought into because I have long believed that, in an ideal society, citizens should be able to earn additional votes by virtue of one’s commitment and contribution to society, etc. This does not nullify the basic democratic principle of One Man One Vote, but rather extends it in acknowledgement of the obvious fact that some individuals are more worthy than others, and therefore SOME MEN deserve MANY VOTES..!

Listed below, in ascending order of importance, are what I have nominated as the qualifiers for CommonSense Democracy. (note that with our existing IRRATIONAL system “Citizenship” is the only qualification, which is rather like passing a driving test by merely knowing which side of the road to drive on.) Under CSD, Citizenship will remain the basic qualification but, in terms of an individuals voting power, it will be the least valuable of 5 qualifiers. Note that people will vote for ISSUES, not POLITICIANS..! In the future (as in the past) there will be no need for Politicians as we know them, by which I mean PROFESSIONAL (ie, highly paid) POLITICIANS.

QUALIFIERS FOR COMMONSENSE DEMOCRACY (CSD)

1) CITIZENSHIP – basic single vote for all citizens.
2) CONDUCT – eg, temporary suspension of voting rights for misconduct.
3) COMMITMENT – length of residence in a particular community.
4) CONTRIBUTION – taxes, rates, etc, contributed to the community.
5) COMPREHENSION – an individuals knowledge of the issue he is voting on.

In our existing hyper-capitalistic societies, a very clever chap is one who earns big bucks but withholds as much as he legally can from the state. In a decent society, this would amount to unethical behaviour but, Arsezania being what it is, I am of course 100% in agreement with this!. But in a society of our own making, tailored to our own specifications, there can be no better incentive to not dodge ones taxes, etc, than to be able to boast “I pay $xxx in taxes, so I qualify for maximum votes in the legislature..!”

How many additional votes one might qualify for under such a system would obviously be a matter for furious debate, but in order not to concentrate too much power in any one individual there should be an upper limit.
An average worthy citizen might qualify for between 10 and 30 votes (depending on his/her score in category 5) and a maximum of 50 or 100. As I said this is highly contentious topic.

Also note that, in principle at least, any individual could qualify for maximum votes. Nobody is penalized on account of his/her lowly heritage, education, or IQ. Neither would one be disadvantaged by colour or creed.

Mbeki's "Quiet Ethnic Cleansing" a prelude to open Genocide

Mbeki said “the victory of the national liberation struggle did not result in the departure of the foreign ruling class." In other words “the struggle is not complete till we’ve finally rid ourselves of the whites (foreign ruling class)”.

But I would not describe the Afro-Nazi Criminals present tactics as genocide (at least not yet) but rather as “quiet ethnic cleansing” facilitated by a climate of “anarcho-tyranny”. They actually do not want us to leave too quickly – or whilst we still possess some wealth they can steal – for their intention is, as always, to have their cake and eat it. To “punish” – through crime and pauperization - as many of us as possible whilst simultaneously whittling our numbers down to a level at which point the genocide option will look increasingly attractive to them. The big question is – what residual number of whites will they consider a suitably lower level for them to openly enact a “final solution”?

Consider Rhodesia - at its peak in the mid-70’s whites numbered about 250,000, but two-thirds left within the first few years of black rule. Unlike the backs-to-the-wall situation SA whites now find themselves in, Rhodies were lucky to have a friendly white-ruled country just a car drive away. So, after just a few years of black rule, whites (never more than 5% of the total) were reduced to less than 1% of Zim’s population. Even so it was many years before Mugarbage gathered the “courage” to finally address his “white problem”, although rumour has it that he had planned to act earlier (around 1990), but the ANC begged him to wait till after they had consolidated power. (thus explaining Mbeki’s “quiet diplomacy”).

The existing ANC programme of rampant racial discrimination, demonisation, and indirectly sponsored violence has reduced SA’s whites from about 5.2m in 1994 to maybe 4.2m in 2008 (about 14% a decade). SA whites not having the luxury of “a friendly country just down the road”, and as half of those who can leave easily have probably already done so, it will take something VERY BIG to reduce the white pop’n down to 1%. And even if it were to happen, there would still be at least 500,000. Therefore, if they intend to maintain a white attrition rate of 14% per decade, let alone increase the rate, the ANC will have to step up their hate campaigns substantially.

Assuming an attrition rate of 14% a decade, the future white pop’n can be extrapolated as…

2008 – 4.20 m (estimate)
2018 – 3.61 million
2028 – 3.10 m
2038 – 2.67 m

If we assume the black population (excl coloured and Indian “honorary blacks”) to be 40 million now, it may take 20 years before whites are reduced to the 5% of Rhodesia’s peak, even with a continuing huge influx of illegal blacks.

Remember that in the main cities and other parts of the country where they are concentrated, whites are “only” outnumbered about 5 to 1 or less and, unless armed with AK’s, cowardly blacks will not have the “courage” to openly attack us with less than 20 to 1 odds. And yet I also cannot see them having the patience to wait more than another decade for the final “re-distribution” of whites “ill-gotten apartheid gains”. South Africa being such a large country I also don’t believe they will be able to plan, let alone enact and co-ordinate a “spontaneous” national uprising.

Therefore, the most likely scenario is that, sometime before 2020, the relentless demands of the majority and a massive (possibly worldwide) financial crisis plus, will force the ANC to play its dirty hand, probably through some radical surrogates like the youth league.

In localized rural areas the black uprising may well take the form of a Rwandan-style “panga pogrom”, but in the cities for such an uprising to be successful a large number of blacks would need to be armed with AK’s, and it is very unlikely that this can be done without giving ample warning to the intended victims.

If, or rather when, something like this happens, it will prove be a blessing in disguise, as even the liberals must then finally awake from their mandelatopian dreams and realize their only hope is to carve out their own enclaves from the ruins of the rainbow nation.

The bottom line is - I believe the blacks greed and impatience will bring this scenario about sooner rather than later.