The mystery of Albert Schweitzer's heretical passage.

Remember this..?

"I have given my life to try to alleviate the sufferings of Africa. There is something that all white men who have lived here like I must learn and know: that these individuals are a sub-race. They have neither the intellectual, mental, or emotional abilities to equate or to share equally with white men in any function of our civilization. I have given my life to try to bring them the advantages which our civilization must offer, but I have become well aware that we must retain this status: the superior and they the inferior. For whenever a white man seeks to live among them as their equals they will either destroy him or devour him. And they will destroy all of his work. Let white men from anywhere in the world, who would come to Africa, remember that you must continually retain this status; you the master and they the inferior like children that you would help or teach. Never fraternize with them as equals. Never accept them as your social equals or they will devour you. They will destroy you."

I'll return to that, but meanwhile....

Many people today would be amazed and shocked to discover that, prior to WW2 (and, to a gradually lesser degree, until the early 1960’s) virtually all white men of learning and distinction would today be regarded as “racial supremacists of the worst sort”. This is largely why the acronym “DWEM” (Dead White European Male) had to be coined, in order to belittle their academic heritage whilst poking fun both at their imperfect morality and their mortality.

“Young people – don’t be in awe of past generations of white men – firstly they are dead, so they cannot have been as great as they have been portrayed, and secondly you can safely ignore much of what they said because most of them were odious racists”.

For example, here are a couple of quotes from 2 famous American “liberals”
(uh-oh, I can’t vouch for their accuracy either, but they do ring truthful for their times)

Inscribed on the Jefferson Memorial in Washington DC in reference to Negro slaves:

"Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate, than that these people are to be free.”

Thomas Jefferson's actual words:

"Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate, than that these people are to be free; nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them."

Abraham Lincoln to a group of Negro community leaders on August 14th of 1862:

"Why should the people of your race be colonized, and where? Why should they leave this country? This is, perhaps, the first question for proper consideration. You and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss, but this physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think your race suffer very greatly, many of them by living among us, while ours suffer from your presence. In a word, we suffer on each side. If this be admitted, it affords a reason at least why we should be separated. It is better for both, therefore, to be separated."

Therefore, it came as no great surprise to find that Albert Schweitzer held “racist” opinions about blacks, especially so since he lived amongst them for 50 years. That is to say he didn’t believe the prevailing orthodoxy - the Marxist misinformation that “all races are inherently equal”, and that if some APPEAR not to be equal it is only because they haven’t been educated”. In other words, its whiteys fault AS USUAL of course, as it is our responsibility to educate them isn’t it? (If, like me, you can immediately spot the flagrant flaw within this classic case of “liberal logic”, then you are obviously a racist too..!)

Now if one hundred liberals had loudly proclaimed that Schweitzer, a Nobel Prize Peace Prize winner, “never said such a thing” I would have rightfully ignored them due to the liberal urgency to grasp at the flimsiest straw that would seem to support racial equality whilst ignoring the strongest tree pointing in the opposite direction. Liberals are part liar, part fools, and part self-deceivers, but mostly they are intellectually dishonest LIARS..!

However, once a single “race-realist” (ie, an intellectually honest person) sincerely questions the veracity of the passage, then I really have to think again. Also the more I thought about this "quote" the more I began to get suspicious, esp as there was no chapter/page reference. It is very important that us RR's dont publish untruths - that is the trademark of the lying liberal.

A bit of internet searching didn’t throw any new light on the matter, so it necessitated a trip to my local library, which in my case is the South African Library in the Company Gardens. The first surprise - given it supposedly contained the heretical passage - was that they had the book at all. But they have both the original German version and the 1938 English translation (by Mrs C.E.B.Russell) .

As the title suggests, “African Notebook” is rather a short book, of about 132 pages, and doesn’t appear to have any controversial content aside from a short chapter (p.48-56) entitled “differences between white and black people". (Today, to even suggest there are ANY differences aside from skin colour would be considered controversial, as we all now know there are NO differences, don’t we?) But even this potentially scandalous chapter doesn’t say anything negative about Africans – on the contrary - rather like a “progressive” white apologist, Schweitzer is at pains to focus on a few common traits wherein (given a bit of liberal embellishMUNT) Africans could in some trivial ways considered to be BETTER than whites..!

With the benefit of hindsight it was suspicious that a specific chapter or page was never mentioned, only the name of the book. Also, in 1950, the Useless Nations (in a foretaste of the lunacy for which it was to become known) solemnly declared that all humans were equal.
All in all, it would have been surprising for him to have won a Nobel Prize AFTER saying such things, even back in 1951.

Of course, this does not mean that Schweitzer NEVER expressed these words, but if he did then I am now quite sure it was not in a mainstream publication – more likely it was in an interview (or letter) to an obscure European magazine and most probably not long before his death at the age of 90 in 1965. Old people are inclined to speak their mind – it is perhaps the only advantage bestowed by old age. Besides which, it is apparently acknowledged even amongst liberals that Schweitzer did have some racist traits – he would not sit at the same dining table as Africans, for example, and this dovetails rather closely with some of what he purportedly said in the heretical passage.

The bottom line is, it doesn’t really matter whether he said it or not, because anyone who knows the African mentality well, knows the sentiments expressed are 100% accurate.

The Disaster of Democrazy..!

DEMOCRAZY is a fatally flawed concept, even in civilised countries. Last night I watched in disgust as Billary blatantly bribed the MORONITY with freebies and subsidies and suchlike.

But as bad as it is in the West it is an unmitigated disaster for white people in African countries. And yet, if you were to ask them, 99% still claim to believe in it. Whites have truly become tragic victims of their own well-intentioned propaganda.

The only way out of this bind is for like-minded people to seek out under-populated land in friendly host countries that would be willing to offer very long leases in which to create new city-states and mini-states from scratch.

Many South/Central American countries have vast swathes of under-utilised territories and might be amenable. Such enclaves/colonies would offer many advantages for the host country too.

Qualified franchise seems like a good idea, but qualified by what parameters?

This is a subject I’ve put quite a lot of thought into because I have long believed that, in an ideal society, citizens should be able to earn additional votes by virtue of one’s commitment and contribution to society, etc. This does not nullify the basic democratic principle of One Man One Vote, but rather extends it in acknowledgement of the obvious fact that some individuals are more worthy than others, and therefore SOME MEN deserve MANY VOTES..!

Listed below, in ascending order of importance, are what I have nominated as the qualifiers for CommonSense Democracy. (note that with our existing IRRATIONAL system “Citizenship” is the only qualification, which is rather like passing a driving test by merely knowing which side of the road to drive on.) Under CSD, Citizenship will remain the basic qualification but, in terms of an individuals voting power, it will be the least valuable of 5 qualifiers. Note that people will vote for ISSUES, not POLITICIANS..! In the future (as in the past) there will be no need for Politicians as we know them, by which I mean PROFESSIONAL (ie, highly paid) POLITICIANS.

QUALIFIERS FOR COMMONSENSE DEMOCRACY (CSD)

1) CITIZENSHIP – basic single vote for all citizens.
2) CONDUCT – eg, temporary suspension of voting rights for misconduct.
3) COMMITMENT – length of residence in a particular community.
4) CONTRIBUTION – taxes, rates, etc, contributed to the community.
5) COMPREHENSION – an individuals knowledge of the issue he is voting on.

In our existing hyper-capitalistic societies, a very clever chap is one who earns big bucks but withholds as much as he legally can from the state. In a decent society, this would amount to unethical behaviour but, Arsezania being what it is, I am of course 100% in agreement with this!. But in a society of our own making, tailored to our own specifications, there can be no better incentive to not dodge ones taxes, etc, than to be able to boast “I pay $xxx in taxes, so I qualify for maximum votes in the legislature..!”

How many additional votes one might qualify for under such a system would obviously be a matter for furious debate, but in order not to concentrate too much power in any one individual there should be an upper limit.
An average worthy citizen might qualify for between 10 and 30 votes (depending on his/her score in category 5) and a maximum of 50 or 100. As I said this is highly contentious topic.

Also note that, in principle at least, any individual could qualify for maximum votes. Nobody is penalized on account of his/her lowly heritage, education, or IQ. Neither would one be disadvantaged by colour or creed.

Mbeki's "Quiet Ethnic Cleansing" a prelude to open Genocide

Mbeki said “the victory of the national liberation struggle did not result in the departure of the foreign ruling class." In other words “the struggle is not complete till we’ve finally rid ourselves of the whites (foreign ruling class)”.

But I would not describe the Afro-Nazi Criminals present tactics as genocide (at least not yet) but rather as “quiet ethnic cleansing” facilitated by a climate of “anarcho-tyranny”. They actually do not want us to leave too quickly – or whilst we still possess some wealth they can steal – for their intention is, as always, to have their cake and eat it. To “punish” – through crime and pauperization - as many of us as possible whilst simultaneously whittling our numbers down to a level at which point the genocide option will look increasingly attractive to them. The big question is – what residual number of whites will they consider a suitably lower level for them to openly enact a “final solution”?

Consider Rhodesia - at its peak in the mid-70’s whites numbered about 250,000, but two-thirds left within the first few years of black rule. Unlike the backs-to-the-wall situation SA whites now find themselves in, Rhodies were lucky to have a friendly white-ruled country just a car drive away. So, after just a few years of black rule, whites (never more than 5% of the total) were reduced to less than 1% of Zim’s population. Even so it was many years before Mugarbage gathered the “courage” to finally address his “white problem”, although rumour has it that he had planned to act earlier (around 1990), but the ANC begged him to wait till after they had consolidated power. (thus explaining Mbeki’s “quiet diplomacy”).

The existing ANC programme of rampant racial discrimination, demonisation, and indirectly sponsored violence has reduced SA’s whites from about 5.2m in 1994 to maybe 4.2m in 2008 (about 14% a decade). SA whites not having the luxury of “a friendly country just down the road”, and as half of those who can leave easily have probably already done so, it will take something VERY BIG to reduce the white pop’n down to 1%. And even if it were to happen, there would still be at least 500,000. Therefore, if they intend to maintain a white attrition rate of 14% per decade, let alone increase the rate, the ANC will have to step up their hate campaigns substantially.

Assuming an attrition rate of 14% a decade, the future white pop’n can be extrapolated as…

2008 – 4.20 m (estimate)
2018 – 3.61 million
2028 – 3.10 m
2038 – 2.67 m

If we assume the black population (excl coloured and Indian “honorary blacks”) to be 40 million now, it may take 20 years before whites are reduced to the 5% of Rhodesia’s peak, even with a continuing huge influx of illegal blacks.

Remember that in the main cities and other parts of the country where they are concentrated, whites are “only” outnumbered about 5 to 1 or less and, unless armed with AK’s, cowardly blacks will not have the “courage” to openly attack us with less than 20 to 1 odds. And yet I also cannot see them having the patience to wait more than another decade for the final “re-distribution” of whites “ill-gotten apartheid gains”. South Africa being such a large country I also don’t believe they will be able to plan, let alone enact and co-ordinate a “spontaneous” national uprising.

Therefore, the most likely scenario is that, sometime before 2020, the relentless demands of the majority and a massive (possibly worldwide) financial crisis plus, will force the ANC to play its dirty hand, probably through some radical surrogates like the youth league.

In localized rural areas the black uprising may well take the form of a Rwandan-style “panga pogrom”, but in the cities for such an uprising to be successful a large number of blacks would need to be armed with AK’s, and it is very unlikely that this can be done without giving ample warning to the intended victims.

If, or rather when, something like this happens, it will prove be a blessing in disguise, as even the liberals must then finally awake from their mandelatopian dreams and realize their only hope is to carve out their own enclaves from the ruins of the rainbow nation.

The bottom line is - I believe the blacks greed and impatience will bring this scenario about sooner rather than later.

Black EmpowerMUNT by Extortion (BEE)

ANC spokesmonkeys are forever rambling on about "our people" - "our people must have this", "our people must have that", they drivel incessantly. "Nothing wrong or unusual about that", the tourist to Azania...er, sorry, the New South Africa, might say. "Governments everywhere are always making promises to their people, some of which are even granted".

However, the typical tourist visiting SA has probably been programmed to be utterly faithful to the Mandelatopian "Rainbow Nation" fantasy that he has been hearing about for years, and may even have to chosen to visit SA in order to confirm the reality of the much-touted "miracle". He is probably unaware that there is such an immense social and cultural gulf between black rulers and their white erstwhile "subjects" that black and white can never, ever, truthfully be considered as part of the same country, however much self-delusional white liberals might want or wish it to be. So when the ANC mouths the weasel words "our people", they most certainly are not including whites, esp where the demands of "our people" need to be fulfilled. On the contrary whites are regarded as "alien people" or "non-people" - an incidental "un-natural" resource to be mined and exploited to the limit.

Consider BEE, in which at first large, then medium, and eventually small and family-sized "white" businesses cannot do business without appointing a (thoroughly useless and parasitical) black "partner". In some respects this is similar to the rules in many countries (mostly of the turd world variety) where foreigners cannot do business without a "local partner". So the first thing we notice is that the ANC has - with barely a whimper of outrage - created laws wherein white south africans have been demoted, de facto if not yet de jure, to "alien" or even "non-person" status within their own country.

However, in countries with "local partner" regulations (India quite possibly), the prospective foreign partner knows the rules beforehand and of course he is free to choose a local partner with useful skills and capital to contribute. Neither of course is the case in Apezania where blatantly racist BEE legislation forces whites to donate 100% of their skills and maybe 30% of their profits (more later, needless to say) to a "partner" whose sole "qualifications" are his/her ANC membership and black skin. This amounts to no more, nor less, than anti-white extortion by a "legalised" criminal fraternity, the ANC.

ANC = Afro-Nazi Criminals

BEE = Blacks Extorting Europeans

Knowledge cannot be "stolen".

http://www.ilanamercer.com/Safari.htm

The idea that knowledge (or civilisation) can be "stolen" from others, in the way that artifacts (eg, books) can be stolen, and that such "stolen knowledge" is forever lost to the originators of that knowledge (or civilisation) is so patently looney it really does not deserve discussion. The only possible way this could have been achieved would have been for the Greeks (or other evil whites) to have utterly exterminated the inferentially superior (sic) black (sic) creators (sic) of such a civilisation (sic). And, to the white mans everlasting cost and grief, this ultimate world-cleansing ecological achieveMUNT was sadly was never even considered by white men - not even by the Boers - although they had every incentive and right to do so after one third of their number were treacherously and butchered by the cowardly Dingaan, Shaka's half-brother and assassin.

(Shaka, btw, despite his bloodlust, clearly admired the whites. It is rumoured he learnt his devastating military tactics from his mentor Dingishwayo who, whilst an outcast from his tribe, had spent a lot of time with a British officer who had deserted and "gone native". It is more than likely that, over camp fires, the renegade oficer spoke about military tactics and transferred some of his knowledge to the carefully-listening black man. Anyway, as he was being budgeoned to death by Dingaan and accomplices, Shaka reputedly said "you fools, the white men will now come and conquer you".)

Something never remarked upon is that, historically, genocide is rarely if ever performed by a superior race. On the contrary, it is ALWAYS performed by a cognitively inferior (but numerically superior) race/group against a cognitively superior (but numerically inferior) one. The Nazi's did not contradict this generalisation because, although the Germans are quite probably the most intelligent European nation, Ashkenazi Jews are even brighter. This was an extremely rare, possibly unique in all of history, example of an otherwise highly civilised people engaging in genocide.

The tragic upshot of this episode is that, post WW2, the best interests of the white race have been irreparably harmed by legions of guilt-wracked "white liberals" subjecting the entire white race to everlasting penance and humiliation in the form of "multi-culti" race mixing - a course which can only lead to our own self-destruction - in a foolishly misguided attempt to right this historic wrong...! The post WW2 policy of giving "freedom" to inferior races which have been "oppressed" by whites is part and parcel of this penance seemingly without end. Indeed it would be no exagerration to liken it to a gigantic sacrificial offering - a free feast for the "useless turd extruders" (UTE's) of the "turd world" - in which Rhodesia was the small but tasty appetiser, South Africa the substantial and delicious entre, and no prizes for guessing the name of the yet to be served but enormously rich and satisfying main course...!

In case any of the jewish and american liberals who generously "donated" Rhodesia and South Africa to the "UTE's" are reading this - dont say you weren't warned..!!!

The greatest irony of all is that, ultimately, the white race (of which Ashkenazi Jews are a part) will suffer far more from this never-ending penance than the original victims.

To continue where I left off -

Assume I am the inventor and world authority on hydrolastic dododecahedron widgits (HDW´s). Nobody can "steal" my knowledge from me although, through books, articles, lectures, and the electronic media, I can if I wish choose to disseminate my encyclopaedic knowledge of HDW´s to the ignorant unwashed masses. But, unless my knowledge and expertise is absorbed and taken to new higher levels by another (smarter and more capable) individual, I will remain the world authority until I die or am otherwise eliminated from society.

Note that the person/persons who manage to climb new heights of HDW´s must either be cleverer or more vigorous (or both) than myself. Thousands of years of total lack of achieveMUNT have shown that this is clearly NOT the case with blacks vis a vis whites.

The very fact that many blacks have convinced themselves that "their once great knowledge" was irretrievably stolen from them by evil exploitative whites, is in itself compelling evidence that they are the complete imbecilic morons they most assuredly are...!!!

The Paradox of "Anti-Racism"

Greg Kaffir-Boetie said (on SAS 01 Aug 2007) –

Most of you people who post here are indeed racist, of the worst kind, like the KKK and even neo-Nazis. I spent six months in SA, most of that time in Johannesburg. During that time, I circulated among blacks, including on minibus taxis and at taxi ranks. The vast majority are not criminals, but are hard-working people, they clean your houses most likely for those of you who live in SA. As for crime, yes there is crime there, I got robbed near MTN taxi rank. Yet the bloggers here and even the media like www.iol.co.za and news24 blow the crime problem out of proportion. Millions of South Africans enjoy their days without encountering crime. As for the hatred that some crimes, like farm attacks, exhibit, that is indeed horrendous. However, what you fail to mention each time is that over three hundred years of white racism and brutality, and forty years of sheer brutality under apartheid (the murder of Biko in 1977 just one case in point among many), has produced some blacks who hate whites to the point that they will do horrendous things. The same happens in US on a lesser scale. But that has not turned me into a racist. In fact I am much more likely to believe AZAPO than anything bloggers here have to say. Many bloggers here accuse ANC of being Marxist. They are far from it, having taken a 360 degree turn since the 1994 election from their previous economic policy statements, to the point that many, including AZAPO, COSATU and the PAC accuse ANC of pandering to foreign investors. Whether that charge is entirely true is something I still need to examine. Clearly, the ANC is not, contrary to what bloggers here say anti-white. There are whites who still work for ANC in Lutuli house in Johannesburg. The ANC has long included whites who truly understood the struggle - like Joe Slovo.

To Bantu Education - I do not have a blog, never said I have one. I just started posting comments here because I got fed up with the racism, and did not want to hide behind anonymous. I am white, live currently in Cincinnati, Ohio USA. While I was in South Africa I made friends with a few black South Africans and I can see that they are right - there is still a lot of white racism in South Africa.

What about black racism Greg KB? In my 16 years in this country I recall maybe a dozen examples of whites killing blacks, some of which were clearly accidental like the recent “I thought it was a dog” case or, some years ago, a poor white smallholder Nicholas Steyn heard rustling noises on his land; having called out a verbal warning he then fired a warning shot in the air that richocheted off a power line and killed 2 yr old “Baby Angelina” who was hiding in the bush with her sister. The black family apparently squatted on the Steyn's land and poor blacks and poor whites were on good terms with each other according to some newspaper accounts.

But the hapless Steyn was accused of "murder" and savaged relentlessly by the media for a year or more and at every court appearance had to run the gauntlet of packs of hate-dripping blacks baying for his blood and wanting to savage him in traditional fashion. In fact Steyn was so much in fear of his life be begged to be kept in jail and not let out on bail.

Like many others since, this incident was manipulated by the ANC into a general white-bashing opportunity. Mandela couldn't resist joining in the anti-white hate-fest by staging a “photo opportunity” with Angelina's “grieving family” where he issued grave threats to "racist gun-toting whites" whilst not expressing an ounce of sympathy for Steyn's unfortunate predicament and his equally traumatised and very frightened old folks.

My point is this - in EVERY SINGLE INSTANCE the media paints white on black killings as racist-inspired. Meanwhile, black on white crime being so downplayed and under-reported, I have barely been aware of the tip of the white genocide iceberg, but even so I must have heard of many hundreds if not thousands. As best as I recall, NOT A SINGLE ONE has ever been painted by the media as racist-inspired..!

And what better example than the murder of Juan Lee Olivier, a few stories down from this one ?

And then we have the anti-white rantings of comrade M’beggi who, every time he opens his mouth, implies that all whites are racist and only whites are ever guilty of racism. How come I get the distinct impression that the noble oppressed peaceloving blacks are incapable of contracting this white social disease.?

Given that "racism" is said to be the most repugnant social disease of our times, then anyone who claims, or implies, that whites are capable of racism whilst blacks are not is really saying that whites have lower moral standards than blacks. The irony of this position should be patently obvious but moralising "anti-racists" like greg, who only ever see whites as racist, are blind to the mote in their own eyes. Because to imply that one race has lower moral standards than another is one of the very definitions of racism itself..!! In other words "anti-racists are the real racists.."..!

Although the media will occasionally (but very infrequently) label a black beast like Mugabe as a racist, the dirty label somehow doesn’t stick for long and is not really taken seriously either by the media or the blacks themselves. Therefore, because the racist label is almost invariably only ever used (abused) against whites, it amounts to a form of HATE SPEECH to use exclusively against whites..!

Greg's attitude reminds me of the white traitors who were used by the ANC to transport weapons and explosives in their cars and cache them in their houses/garages for later use by the ANC. (These "whites" were incredibly useful to the black terrorists because they could move around without suspicion). A few years ago ANC-TV made a documentary glorifying these white “struggle heroes”. I particularly remember an otherwise attractive young white couple who admitted on camera that, after all their dedicated traitorous work, they were “rather disappointed” when the promised and hoped-for bloodbath of whites by blacks did not eventuate…!!! In the annals of history, has any other race stooped to such lows of self-abasement as these "whites"..?

But perhaps their “work” wasn’t in vain – maybe the bloodbath is still coming..? If, or rather when, it does it will be largely due to the efforts of self-abasing race traitors like Greg KB who use every opportunity and excuse to slander white south Africans as “a despicable bunch of racists”..!

"Mystified" Liberals just dont get it

Liberals are not mystified when Comrade “Great African Liberator” Robber Mugarbage steals white farms, even though this meant destroying the very foundations of the Zimbabwe economy.

Liberals are not mystified when Comrade Chairboy Tarboii M’beggi feigns to engage in “quiet (ie, silent; ie, non-existent) diplomacy” when faced with such typicals act of African "enterprise" as stealing, extortion, and murdering.

So we have established that Liberals are not at all mystified when blacks terrorise, pauperise, and even murder whites, because (they smugly self-justify) such regrettable actions have “understandable” historical justifications.

Cultural Note 1: notice how often liberals employ mawkish over-sentimentality - words like “understanding”, "concerned", and "regrettable" are among the most popular in the liberal lexicon of self-deceit.

BUT when, in his exalted duty of “getting rid of our colonialist legacy”, the demented despot Mugarbage destroys the livelihood of millions of blacks, liberals wring their guilt-wracked hands in agonized horror and claim to be "MYSTIFIED” as to why he would want to hurt “his own people”?

Cultural Note 2: the liberal mindset applies a double or even triple moral standard. Whites cannot be forgiven for mistreating blacks, whereas blacks can and are forgiven for everything, especially mistreating whites. In other words liberals admit (and EXPECT) blacks readily (and naturally) discriminate against whites in favour of their fellow blacks, which amounts to a subliminal acknowledgment that blacks are natural-born racists..!

What liberals fail to understand, and will never admit, is that negroids are a PSYCOPATHIC sub-species and the human qualities of empathy and altruism (which are most developed in the white race) are either very weak or non-existent in most of these vile creatures.

Blacks as Jekyll and Hyde Creatures.

When negroids are in their natural subservient position they are typically smilingly obediant and jolly, which of course endears them to us. Other times they can be obsequious to the point of grovelling, which tends to embarass us. But when given even a small degree of power they quickly develop an "attitude". They lose their smile and become surly, arrogant, and bullying. When they are given great power they become totally demented devils who simply DONT CARE about anyone except themselves and their inner circles, with whom they share a symbiotic need to keep each other in power.

It should be clear to any level-headed INTELLECTUALLY HONEST person that blacks are very different from whites - and we are not talking about physical appearance, but social behaviour. It should also be obvious - given their glaring lack of any useful contribution to civilisation - that they are a very INFERIOR race. However, most whites are so riddled with "equality" nonsense and the guilt this engenders (because it must be whitey's fault that blacks are clearly not "equal"), that they are repelled by the very notion of "inferiority" in respect of race, although they will routinely use it to apply to almost anything else.

DIRE - The Doctrine of Innate Racial Equality

It is the insidious neo-marxist DIRE propaganda that has infected these liberals and, unless it is totally rejected as the falsehood it clearly is, will surely end in the self-destruction of the white race.

Communism may have lost the cold war but marxist theory lives on and flourishes in all our government-funded educational institutions, which have become breeding grounds for these internal enemies and race traitors (aka white "liberals").

Ultimately it is not blacks and muslims - evil as they are, but both of whom we can defeat easily in a fair fight - but the entire post-WW2 liberal "education" system we are fighting against.